Custom software that implements all 110 NIST SP 800-171 controls, manages your System Security Plan, tracks POA&M remediation, automates SPRS scoring, and prepares your organization for C3PAO assessment. FreedomDev builds CMMC Level 2 compliance platforms for small and mid-size defense contractors who handle Controlled Unclassified Information — with 20+ years delivering regulated software for the defense industrial base.
CMMC 2.0 is not a suggestion. It is a contract eligibility requirement. The Department of Defense finalized the CMMC Program rule (32 CFR Part 170) in October 2024, and CMMC requirements are now appearing in solicitations. Contractors who handle Controlled Unclassified Information on DoD contracts must achieve CMMC Level 2 certification through a third-party assessment conducted by an authorized C3PAO (CMMC Third-Party Assessment Organization). No certification means no contract award. For small and mid-size defense contractors — the Tier 2, Tier 3, and Tier 4 suppliers who make up 80% of the defense industrial base — this is not a compliance exercise. It is an existential business requirement. Lose your CMMC certification and you lose your ability to bid on, win, or perform DoD contracts. Your revenue stream disappears.
The scope of what CMMC Level 2 requires is staggering for companies that have been self-attesting compliance under DFARS 252.204-7012. Level 2 maps directly to all 110 security practices in NIST SP 800-171 Revision 2, organized across 14 control families: Access Control (22 practices), Awareness and Training (3 practices), Audit and Accountability (9 practices), Configuration Management (9 practices), Identification and Authentication (11 practices), Incident Response (3 practices), Maintenance (6 practices), Media Protection (9 practices), Personnel Security (2 practices), Physical Protection (6 practices), Risk Assessment (3 practices), Security Assessment (4 practices), System and Communications Protection (16 practices), and System and Information Integrity (7 practices). Each practice must be fully implemented — not partially, not planned, not documented as a future intention. The C3PAO assessor evaluates whether each practice is implemented, whether evidence supports that implementation, and whether the implementation is operating effectively. A practice that exists in your policy document but is not demonstrably operational in your environment will be scored as Not Met.
The SPRS (Supplier Performance Risk System) scoring methodology quantifies your gaps with painful precision. A perfect NIST 800-171 implementation scores 110. Each unimplemented practice carries a weighted penalty of 1, 3, or 5 points depending on the security impact. A contractor who has implemented only basic access controls and antivirus but lacks encryption, multi-factor authentication, audit logging, and incident response capabilities — which describes the majority of small defense contractors we assess — typically scores between 30 and 70 out of 110. The DoD already requires contractors to post their SPRS score, and contracting officers are using these scores in source selection decisions today, before CMMC assessments even begin. A low SPRS score does not just mean you will fail CMMC assessment. It means primes are already passing you over for subcontracts in favor of competitors with higher scores.
The cost of failed assessment is not just the assessment fee. A C3PAO assessment for a small-to-mid-size contractor costs $30,000 to $120,000 depending on the scope of your CUI environment. If you fail, you pay again for reassessment after remediation. But the real cost is delay. Remediation after a failed assessment takes 6 to 18 months — redesigning network architecture, implementing encryption, deploying SIEM systems, building incident response capabilities, retraining staff, and documenting everything to the standard the assessor expects. During that remediation period, you cannot bid on CMMC-required contracts. Your competitors who invested in compliance before assessment are winning the work you are losing. We have seen Tier 2 defense suppliers lose $2 to $5 million in contract opportunities during post-failure remediation periods. The companies that survive CMMC are the ones who build compliance into their systems architecture before the assessor walks in the door — not the ones scrambling to check boxes after a failed assessment.
CMMC Level 2 requires full implementation of all 110 NIST SP 800-171 practices — not partial, not planned, not policy-only
C3PAO assessment costs $30K–$120K and must be repeated if you fail, with 6–18 months remediation before reassessment
SPRS scores below 110 are already visible to primes and contracting officers — low scores lose subcontracts today
Self-attestation under DFARS 252.204-7012 masked compliance gaps that C3PAO assessors will not overlook
Small/mid-size contractors lack dedicated cybersecurity staff to implement 14 control families simultaneously
CUI boundary definition is ambiguous — most contractors vastly over-scope their assessment environment, increasing cost and failure risk
Our engineers have built this exact solution for other businesses. Let's discuss your requirements.
FreedomDev builds custom compliance platforms that implement CMMC Level 2 requirements as functional system architecture — not as policy documents that sit in a SharePoint folder until assessment day. Every NIST SP 800-171 practice maps to a specific technical control, an operational workflow, or both, enforced within the software your team uses daily. Access Control practices (AC.L2-3.1.1 through AC.L2-3.1.22) are implemented through role-based access with least privilege enforcement, session timeout and lock controls, remote access management with VPN and MFA requirements, wireless access restrictions, and mobile device controls. Audit and Accountability practices (AU.L2-3.3.1 through AU.L2-3.3.9) are implemented through comprehensive event logging that captures every CUI access event, every authentication attempt, every configuration change, and every privileged action — with tamper-evident log storage, automated log review and correlation, and retention policies that satisfy both NIST 800-171 and your specific contract CDRL requirements.
The System Security Plan is the backbone document of every CMMC assessment, and most contractors treat it as a Word document that someone updates once a year. That approach fails assessment. Your SSP must accurately describe your current security posture — the system boundary, the CUI data flows, the specific technical and procedural controls implemented for each of the 110 practices, the responsible parties, and the status of implementation. When it does not match what the assessor finds in your environment, you fail. FreedomDev's compliance platform generates and maintains your SSP as a living document that updates automatically as your environment changes. When a new user is provisioned, the access control section reflects it. When a configuration change is deployed, the configuration management section updates. When an incident occurs and your response procedures execute, the incident response section captures the evidence. The SSP the assessor reviews is never stale because it is generated from the same system that enforces the controls.
Plans of Action and Milestones are where most small contractors get trapped. CMMC 2.0 allows limited use of POA&Ms — you can achieve conditional certification with open POA&Ms, but only for practices that are partially implemented and only if you remediate within 180 days. Practices with no implementation at all cannot be POA&M'd — they are assessed as Not Met and prevent certification. The difference between a practice that is partially implemented (eligible for POA&M) and one that has no implementation (automatic failure) comes down to evidence. FreedomDev's platform tracks every practice's implementation status with the specific evidence artifacts the C3PAO assessor will request: configuration screenshots, policy documents with approval signatures, access control lists, audit log samples, vulnerability scan results, incident response exercise records, and training completion records. For practices on your POA&M, the platform tracks remediation milestones with deadlines, assigns responsibility to specific team members, and provides the assessor with a clear timeline to full implementation.
CUI boundary scoping is the single highest-leverage decision in your CMMC program, and most contractors get it catastrophically wrong. Every system, network segment, application, and storage location that stores, processes, or transmits CUI falls within your assessment boundary. Every system that provides security protection for CUI assets also falls within scope. The larger your boundary, the more systems must implement all 110 controls, the more expensive your compliance program, and the more surface area for assessment findings. FreedomDev works with your team to define the minimum viable CUI boundary — isolating CUI handling into a defined enclave with controlled entry and exit points rather than letting CUI spread across your entire enterprise network. This is not a documentation exercise. It requires network segmentation, data flow mapping, access control restructuring, and often the deployment of dedicated CUI processing environments. Reducing your CUI boundary from your entire network to a defined enclave can cut assessment scope by 60 to 80 percent and reduce compliance costs proportionally.
Every NIST SP 800-171 practice gets a dedicated tracking record with implementation status (Not Implemented, Partially Implemented, Fully Implemented), the specific technical and procedural controls that satisfy the practice, evidence artifacts attached directly to the practice record (configuration exports, screenshots, policy documents, scan results), the responsible party, last review date, and next review date. The assessor sees exactly what you have implemented, how you implemented it, and the evidence that proves it works. Status changes are audit-logged and timestamped so you can demonstrate your compliance posture at any point in time.
Your SSP generates from live system data — not from a Word template someone fills out annually. The platform pulls current access control configurations, network topology documentation, encryption status, audit log configurations, incident response procedures, and maintenance records to produce an SSP that accurately reflects your environment at the moment of generation. Section references map directly to NIST SP 800-171 practice numbers. The SSP includes CUI data flow diagrams, system boundary definitions, interconnection agreements, and the specific implementation details for each control family that C3PAO assessors evaluate.
For practices that are partially implemented at assessment time, the platform manages your Plan of Action and Milestones with the specificity CMMC requires. Each POA&M item identifies the specific practice, describes the current partial implementation, defines the target end state, lists the remediation steps with assigned owners and deadlines, tracks completion evidence, and calculates remaining days against the 180-day conditional certification window. Automated alerts fire at 30, 60, 90, 120, and 150 days to prevent deadline failures that would revoke your conditional certification.
The platform calculates your SPRS score in real time based on your current implementation status across all 110 practices, applying the DoD-specified weighting methodology (1, 3, or 5-point deductions per unimplemented practice based on security impact). Your SPRS dashboard shows your current score, the specific practices dragging it down, and the score improvement you would gain from implementing each remaining practice — allowing you to prioritize remediation efforts for maximum score impact. Historical SPRS scores are tracked over time so you can demonstrate compliance trajectory to primes and contracting officers.
The platform documents your CUI assessment boundary with precision: which systems are in scope (store, process, or transmit CUI), which systems provide security protection for in-scope assets, which systems are out of scope, and the technical controls that enforce boundary separation. CUI data flow diagrams are maintained as living documents that update when new systems are added or data flows change. The scoping documentation satisfies the assessor's first question in every C3PAO assessment: show me your boundary, and prove that CUI cannot leave it without going through controlled channels.
Before you spend $30,000 to $120,000 on a C3PAO assessment, the platform runs an internal readiness evaluation modeled on the CMMC assessment methodology. Each practice is evaluated against the same criteria an assessor would use: is the practice implemented, does evidence support the implementation, and is the implementation operating effectively. Practices that lack evidence, have stale documentation, or show implementation gaps are flagged with specific remediation guidance. The dashboard provides a go/no-go recommendation for scheduling your C3PAO assessment, so you do not pay for an assessment you are not ready to pass.
We scored a 47 on our initial SPRS self-assessment and had no idea where to start. FreedomDev scoped our CUI environment, designed an enclave that reduced our boundary from 340 endpoints to 45, implemented every control, and built us a compliance platform that tracks everything the assessor needs. We scored 110 at our C3PAO assessment nine months later. Without that work, we would have lost our primary contract with a Tier 1 prime.
We start by defining what needs to be protected and where it lives. Working with your contracts team, we identify every active DoD contract that involves CUI, catalog the CUI categories and marking indicators (per DoDI 5200.48 and the CUI Registry), and trace CUI data flows through your environment — from receipt through processing, storage, transmission, and disposal. We then map your current security posture against all 110 NIST SP 800-171 practices, scoring each as Not Implemented, Partially Implemented, or Fully Implemented with evidence. Deliverable: a CUI boundary definition, a gap assessment report with your current SPRS score, and a prioritized remediation roadmap with cost and timeline estimates for each practice.
The highest-ROI activity in any CMMC program is reducing your assessment boundary. We design a CUI enclave — a network-segmented environment with controlled access where all CUI processing occurs — so that the 110 controls apply only to the enclave, not your entire corporate network. This involves VLAN segmentation or physical network separation, dedicated CUI workstations or virtual desktop infrastructure, separate Active Directory organizational units with enclave-specific group policies, controlled data transfer mechanisms between the enclave and your corporate environment, and boundary defense devices (firewalls, proxies) at every ingress and egress point. Boundary reduction typically cuts assessment scope by 60 to 80 percent and is the single most cost-effective compliance investment.
We implement the technical controls required by each NIST 800-171 practice across your CUI environment. Access Control: role-based access with least privilege, multi-factor authentication for all CUI system access, session controls, remote access through managed VPN. Audit and Accountability: SIEM deployment or configuration, comprehensive event logging, tamper-evident log storage, automated log review rules. Configuration Management: baseline configurations for all CUI systems, change control workflows, vulnerability scanning and remediation cycles. System and Communications Protection: FIPS 140-2 validated encryption for CUI in transit and at rest, network boundary protections, DNS filtering, email security controls. Identification and Authentication: centralized identity management, password complexity enforcement, privileged account management. Each control is documented with implementation evidence linked directly to the corresponding NIST practice number.
We deploy the CMMC compliance platform configured for your environment: all 110 practices loaded with your specific implementation details, evidence artifacts linked, POA&M items created for any remaining gaps, SPRS score calculated, and SSP generated from live data. Your team receives role-specific training — IT administrators learn the technical control monitoring dashboards, compliance officers learn the evidence management and SSP workflows, and executives learn the SPRS score tracking and assessment readiness views. The platform integrates with your existing IT systems through the API connections needed to pull live configuration data, audit logs, and vulnerability scan results into the compliance evidence repository.
We conduct a full mock assessment using the CMMC Assessment Guide methodology. Every practice is evaluated the way a C3PAO assessor would evaluate it: evidence is reviewed, configurations are verified, personnel are interviewed about their responsibilities under each control family, and the SSP is compared against the operational reality. Practices that would receive Not Met or partially implemented findings get immediate remediation attention. We prepare the specific documentation packages that C3PAO assessors request on day one of assessment: the SSP, the network diagram, the CUI boundary documentation, the POA&M (if applicable), the asset inventory, and the policy and procedure library mapped to each control family. When the C3PAO arrives, your team knows exactly what to expect because they have already been through the process.
| Metric | With FreedomDev | Without |
|---|---|---|
| NIST 800-171 Coverage | All 110 practices implemented as technical controls, not policy-only | GRC platforms map practices to checklists — you configure the actual controls yourself |
| SSP Generation | Auto-generated from live system data — always current, never stale | Word/Excel templates updated manually before assessment — always outdated on day one |
| SPRS Scoring | Real-time calculation with weighted practice-by-practice analysis and prioritization | Manual spreadsheet calculation — scored once, rarely updated, often inaccurate |
| CUI Boundary Scoping | Enclave architecture design that reduces scope 60–80% | Consultants document your current boundary — they don't redesign it |
| Evidence Management | Artifacts linked directly to practices, timestamped, version-controlled | Screenshots in SharePoint folders with no traceability to specific controls |
| Implementation Cost | $80K–$200K complete (enclave + controls + platform + SSP + mock assessment) | $50K–$150K consulting (documentation only) + $30K–$80K/yr GRC licensing + you implement controls yourself |
| POA&M Tracking | Automated 180-day countdown, milestone tracking, owner assignment, evidence capture | Spreadsheet with target dates — no automated alerts, no evidence linkage |
| Mock Assessment | Full C3PAO-methodology dry run with practice-by-practice scoring and remediation | Readiness checklist review — not an assessment simulation |
Schedule a direct technical consultation with our senior architects.
Make your software work for you. Let's build a sensible solution.