Custom trading platforms, portfolio management systems, payment processing integrations, and regulatory compliance engines — built for the SOC 2 Type II, PCI DSS, and Dodd-Frank requirements that financial institutions cannot afford to fail. 20+ years building software for banks, credit unions, wealth management firms, and fintech companies.
The average cost of a data breach in the financial services industry is $5.97 million — the second-highest of any sector, according to IBM's 2024 Cost of a Data Breach Report. That number does not include the regulatory penalties. It does not include the customer attrition. It does not include the reputational damage that follows a publicly reported incident. For a regional bank, a single breach can represent two to three years of net profit evaporating in a single quarter. And the regulatory landscape that governs how you handle, store, transmit, and report on financial data is not getting simpler.
Dodd-Frank requires real-time trade reporting and systemic risk monitoring. The SEC and FINRA mandate audit trails for every client-facing transaction, with data retention requirements stretching seven years or more. PCI DSS Level 1 compliance — required for any institution processing over six million card transactions annually — demands quarterly network scans, annual penetration testing, and 12 specific control requirements spanning access management, encryption, and monitoring. AML and KYC regulations under the Bank Secrecy Act require automated transaction monitoring for suspicious activity patterns, with Suspicious Activity Reports filed within 30 days of detection. SOC 2 Type II audits evaluate your controls over a minimum six-month observation period, not just a point-in-time snapshot.
Most off-the-shelf financial software handles some of these requirements. None of them handle all of them in the specific configuration your institution needs. FIS, Fiserv, and Jack Henry dominate the core banking platform market, but their systems were architected for large national banks and retrofitted down to serve regional institutions. The result is over-provisioned software with six-figure annual licensing fees, 18-month implementation timelines, and change request processes that cost $50K per modification. Your compliance team spends as much time working around the software's limitations as they do using its features.
FreedomDev builds financial software that treats compliance as a first-class architectural concern, not an afterthought bolted onto a generic application framework. We have spent 20+ years building custom systems for financial institutions — from community banks automating BSA/AML reporting to wealth management firms building custom portfolio analytics that integrate with Bloomberg Terminal and Refinitiv data feeds. Every system we build starts with your specific regulatory requirements and works outward to the user experience, because in financial services, the regulatory architecture is the architecture.
The financial technology landscape has shifted dramatically in the last five years. Open banking APIs from Plaid and MX connect consumer financial accounts in seconds. Stripe Treasury and Marqeta enable any company to embed financial services into their product. Real-time payment networks like FedNow and RTP are replacing batch-processed ACH for an increasing share of transactions. These are not future trends — they are live production systems that your competitors are already integrating. The question is not whether to modernize your financial technology stack, but whether you build it yourself with a team that understands both the technology and the regulatory constraints, or whether you buy another platform that almost fits and spend the next three years customizing it.
We specialize in building custom software for your industry. Tell us what you're dealing with.
Financial regulation is not static. The SEC adopted new cybersecurity disclosure rules in 2023 requiring material incident reporting within four business days. CFPB's Section 1033 rulemaking is opening consumer financial data to third-party access, with compliance deadlines starting in 2026 for the largest institutions. FinCEN's beneficial ownership reporting requirements under the Corporate Transparency Act took effect in 2024. Each new regulation requires changes to your data models, reporting pipelines, access controls, and audit trails. When your software is a monolithic platform purchased from a vendor, every regulatory change becomes a feature request in someone else's product roadmap — one you cannot control or accelerate. You file the request, wait 6-12 months, and pray the vendor's interpretation of the regulation matches your compliance team's. Custom software built around your regulatory requirements gives you direct control over the compliance architecture. When a new rule drops, your development team updates the system in weeks, not quarters.
70% of core banking systems in the United States run on COBOL — a language from 1959. These mainframe systems process batch transactions overnight, which means a customer's balance does not reflect a deposit until the next business day. They cannot support real-time payment processing, instant account-to-account transfers, or the API-driven integrations that modern fintech partners require. But they also cannot be replaced overnight. Your core banking system processes every transaction, holds every account record, and feeds every regulatory report your institution files. A failed core migration can be an extinction event for a community bank. The path forward is incremental modernization: wrapping legacy cores with modern API layers, building new customer-facing applications that communicate with the core through middleware, and migrating functionality module by module over 18-36 months. FreedomDev has done this for multiple institutions — we understand the COBOL-to-API translation layer because we have built it.
A typical regional bank runs separate systems for core deposits, commercial lending, mortgage origination, wealth management, BSA/AML monitoring, and regulatory reporting. These systems were purchased from different vendors over a 20-year period, each with its own data model, its own user interface, and its own reporting structure. When a relationship manager wants to see a complete picture of a client's relationship — deposits, loans, investments, and transaction history — they log into three or four systems and piece it together manually. When compliance needs to file a CTR for a customer's aggregate cash transactions across multiple accounts, they pull reports from multiple systems and reconcile them in Excel. This is not just inefficient. It is a regulatory risk. The Bank Secrecy Act requires institutions to monitor customer activity across all accounts and products. Siloed systems make that structurally difficult and error-prone.
Your institution processes payments across ACH, wire transfers, FedNow, card networks (Visa, Mastercard, Amex), and potentially international rails like SWIFT. Each payment rail has its own message format (ISO 20022, NACHA, ISO 8583), its own settlement timing, its own fraud detection requirements, and its own compliance obligations. PCI DSS governs card data — 12 requirements spanning network segmentation, encryption, access logging, and vulnerability management. OFAC screening must run against every outbound wire and ACH payment in real time. Regulation E governs electronic fund transfer error resolution timelines. Building a unified payment processing layer that handles all of these rails while maintaining compliance with each framework's specific requirements is one of the most complex integration challenges in financial services. Most institutions cobble together point-to-point integrations between payment processors and back-office systems. The result is brittle, expensive to maintain, and nearly impossible to extend when a new payment rail or compliance requirement emerges.
A financial institution does not pass one security audit. It passes several, simultaneously, on overlapping and sometimes conflicting timelines. SOC 2 Type II evaluates your security, availability, processing integrity, confidentiality, and privacy controls over a six-to-twelve-month observation period. FFIEC examiners assess your information security program against their IT Examination Handbook. PCI DSS requires quarterly ASV scans, annual penetration tests, and continuous compliance with 12 control requirements across six domains. State regulators may impose additional requirements — New York's DFS 23 NYCRR 500 mandates a dedicated CISO, 72-hour breach notification, and specific encryption standards. When your software was not architected with these audit requirements in mind, preparing for each examination becomes a months-long scramble to generate evidence, document controls, and explain compensating controls for gaps. Software built with audit-readiness as a design principle generates compliance evidence as a byproduct of normal operation.
FIS, Fiserv, and Jack Henry collectively control approximately 70% of the U.S. core banking market. Their contracts typically run 7-10 years with early termination penalties that can exceed $1M for a community bank. Annual maintenance fees escalate 3-5% per year regardless of usage. Module additions — mobile banking, digital account opening, P2P payments — each carry their own licensing fee, often $50K-$200K per module plus per-transaction fees that scale with your growth. The economics are designed so that as your institution grows and processes more transactions, your technology costs grow proportionally — or faster. Custom-built systems on open-source stacks eliminate per-transaction fees entirely. You pay for the development once. You pay for hosting and maintenance. But you do not pay a toll every time a customer swipes a card or initiates a transfer. For a bank processing 500,000 monthly transactions, the difference in annual technology cost between a vendor platform and a custom-built system can exceed $300K.
We had been paying our core banking vendor $380K annually in licensing and per-transaction fees, plus another $200K in change orders every time a regulation changed. FreedomDev rebuilt our customer-facing systems and compliance reporting in eight months. Our annual technology cost dropped by 60%, and when the new SEC cyber disclosure rules hit, our system was updated in two weeks — not two quarters.
Wealth management firms and RIAs need portfolio analytics that go beyond what off-the-shelf platforms provide. FreedomDev builds custom portfolio management systems that integrate with Bloomberg Terminal, Refinitiv Eikon, Morningstar, and custodial platforms like Schwab, Fidelity, and Pershing for real-time position data. We build automated performance reporting engines that calculate time-weighted and money-weighted returns, generate GIPS-compliant performance composites, and produce client-facing reports that match your brand — not a generic template from your custodian. Our systems handle multi-asset-class portfolios including alternatives, private equity, and structured products that most out-of-box platforms cannot model correctly. Automated rebalancing engines monitor drift thresholds and generate trade proposals based on your firm's investment policy statements, with full audit trails for SEC examination readiness.
Learn moreWe build unified payment processing layers that abstract the complexity of multiple payment rails into a single integration point for your applications. ACH origination and receipt via NACHA file generation with Regulation E compliance built into the dispute resolution workflow. Real-time payments via FedNow and RTP with instant confirmation and settlement. Card payment processing through Stripe, Adyen, or direct card network integrations with PCI DSS Level 1 compliant data handling — tokenization, point-to-point encryption, and network segmentation. International wire transfers with SWIFT message formatting and real-time OFAC screening. Every transaction logged with the metadata required for BSA/AML monitoring, fraud detection, and regulatory reporting. The payment hub architecture means adding a new payment rail — cryptocurrency settlement, cross-border instant payments, embedded finance APIs — requires integrating once at the hub level, not rewiring every downstream system.
Learn moreWe build automated compliance systems that transform regulatory requirements from manual processes into software-enforced workflows. BSA/AML transaction monitoring that applies rule-based and pattern-based detection across all accounts and products, generating Suspicious Activity Reports with auto-populated FinCEN forms. CTR aggregation that automatically sums cash transactions across all customer accounts within a rolling 24-hour window, eliminating the manual spreadsheet reconciliation that puts most institutions at risk. SEC and FINRA reporting pipelines that generate required filings — Form ADV, 13F, N-PORT — from your actual portfolio and transaction data with full audit trails. HMDA and CRA data collection embedded into your loan origination workflow so fair lending data is captured at the point of origination, not reconstructed after the fact. Every compliance engine includes version-controlled rule definitions so your compliance team can trace exactly which rules were in effect for any historical transaction.
Learn moreSecurity in financial services is not a feature — it is the foundation. FreedomDev architects every financial system with defense-in-depth principles and audit-readiness built into the infrastructure layer. Data encryption at rest (AES-256) and in transit (TLS 1.3). Role-based access control with the principle of least privilege enforced at the API level, not just the UI level. Immutable audit logs that capture every data access, modification, and administrative action with tamper-evident logging. Network segmentation that isolates cardholder data environments from general application infrastructure per PCI DSS requirements. Automated vulnerability scanning integrated into the CI/CD pipeline so security testing happens with every deployment, not once a quarter. Multi-factor authentication with hardware token support for administrative access. We design systems that generate SOC 2 Type II evidence as a natural byproduct of operation — access logs, change management records, incident response documentation — so your audit preparation is continuous, not a twice-yearly scramble.
Learn moreReplacing a core banking system is a multi-year, multi-million-dollar undertaking with existential risk if it goes wrong. FreedomDev takes the incremental approach: we wrap your existing core — whether it is a COBOL mainframe, an AS/400 system, or an early-2000s client-server application — with modern RESTful APIs that expose core functionality to new applications. We build modern user interfaces that give your staff and customers a contemporary experience while transactions still process through the existing core. We migrate functionality module by module: digital account opening first, then online banking, then lending workflow, then reporting. Each module goes live independently, proves itself in production, and only then do we move to the next. This approach has a dramatically lower risk profile than a Big Bang core conversion, and it delivers value to your customers and staff within months instead of years.
Learn moreTraditional rule-based fraud detection generates excessive false positives — legitimate transactions flagged as suspicious — which creates alert fatigue for your fraud analysts and friction for your customers. FreedomDev builds machine learning fraud detection models trained on your institution's specific transaction patterns, customer behavior profiles, and historical fraud cases. These models identify anomalous patterns that rule-based systems miss: gradual account takeover behavior, synthetic identity fraud during account opening, and coordinated fraud rings operating across multiple accounts. Beyond fraud, the same behavioral analytics power customer intelligence: predicting attrition risk before a customer closes their account, identifying cross-sell opportunities based on transaction patterns and life events, and segmenting customers by profitability and engagement for targeted marketing. Every model includes explainability features so your compliance team can document the reasoning behind any automated decision — a requirement for fair lending and ECOA compliance.
Learn more| Metric | FreedomDev | Generic SaaS |
|---|---|---|
| Implementation Timeline | 4–8 months for core modules, production-ready | 12–24 months for FIS/Fiserv core banking implementation |
| Annual Licensing Fees | $0 — you own the codebase | $150K–$500K+ per year for core platform + module licenses |
| Per-Transaction Costs | Zero per-transaction fees on your own system | $0.03–$0.15 per transaction adds up to $200K+ at scale |
| Compliance Customization | Rules engine updated in days when regulations change | Vendor roadmap — 6–12 months for regulatory updates |
| Integration with Fintech APIs | Direct Plaid, Stripe, Bloomberg, FedNow integration built to your spec | Vendor-mediated integrations with limited API flexibility |
| Audit Readiness | SOC 2/PCI DSS evidence generated automatically by design | Manual evidence collection; bolt-on compliance reporting modules |
Schedule a technical consultation with our senior architects.
Make your software work for you. Let's build a sensible solution for Financial Services.
