Flight-critical software to DAL A standards. ITAR-compliant development environments with DFARS 252.204-7012 and CMMC 2.0 Level 2 controls. Custom MRO platforms that replace $500K+ COTS implementations. FreedomDev builds safety-critical, export-controlled, and mission-critical software for aerospace primes, defense subcontractors, and MRO providers — with 20+ years delivering regulated software systems.
Aerospace software is not regular software. When code runs on a flight-critical system — fly-by-wire controls, engine FADEC, collision avoidance, autoland — a defect is not a support ticket. It is a potential loss of aircraft and life. DO-178C (Software Considerations in Airborne Systems and Equipment Certification) exists because the FAA and EASA recognized that traditional software development practices are insufficient for systems where failure consequences are catastrophic. The standard defines five Design Assurance Levels (DAL A through DAL E) based on the severity of failure conditions. DAL A — catastrophic failure conditions that could cause loss of aircraft — requires Modified Condition/Decision Coverage (MC/DC) testing, 100% structural code coverage, independence between verification and development activities, and full traceability from system requirements through software requirements, architecture, source code, and executable object code. DAL B applies to hazardous failure conditions. DAL C covers major failure conditions. DAL D handles minor failures. DAL E applies to no-effect conditions and requires no specific DO-178C objectives.
The cost difference between assurance levels is staggering. Industry data consistently shows that DAL A certification costs 10x to 25x more than DAL D for equivalent functionality, driven almost entirely by the verification, traceability, and documentation requirements — not the code itself. A DAL A project may spend 60-70% of total effort on verification activities alone. This is why accurate failure hazard assessment at the system level (per ARP 4761) is so critical: misclassifying a component as DAL A when it should be DAL C can add millions to development costs and years to the schedule. FreedomDev works with systems engineers and DERs (Designated Engineering Representatives) to ensure software levels are correctly assigned before development begins, not discovered during the Stage of Involvement reviews with FAA certification authorities.
ITAR (International Traffic in Arms Regulations) and EAR (Export Administration Regulations) add another layer of complexity that most commercial software firms do not understand and are not equipped to handle. ITAR controls defense articles and defense services on the United States Munitions List (USML). EAR controls dual-use items on the Commerce Control List (CCL). If your software touches anything on the USML — missile guidance algorithms, satellite command-and-control systems, cryptographic modules for classified communications, electronic warfare signal processing — every person who accesses the source code, design documents, or technical data must be a U.S. person as defined under 22 CFR 120.62. Development environments must be physically and logically segregated. Cloud infrastructure must reside on U.S.-sovereign servers with no foreign national access. Violations carry penalties up to $1.3 million per violation and 20 years imprisonment. This is not compliance theater — it is export control law enforced by the Directorate of Defense Trade Controls (DDTC) and the Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS).
The aerospace MRO (Maintenance, Repair, and Overhaul) market exceeds $90 billion globally and is projected to surpass $115 billion by 2030, driven by fleet aging, increased flight hours, and the transition to performance-based logistics (PBL) contracts. Yet the MRO software landscape is dominated by legacy systems — SAP MRO, IFS Applications, Ramco Aviation, and custom-built mainframe systems from the 1990s — that were designed for paper-based work order flows and do not support modern predictive maintenance, digital twin integration, or real-time parts visibility across multi-tier supply chains. Defense MRO adds DFARS requirements: DFARS 252.204-7012 mandates adequate security for Covered Defense Information (CDI) on contractor systems, and CMMC 2.0 Level 2 certification — which requires compliance with all 110 controls in NIST SP 800-171 — is now required for contractors handling Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI). FreedomDev builds custom MRO platforms that meet both operational and compliance requirements from day one.
Supply chain visibility is the defining challenge of 2020s defense contracting. The defense industrial base is a multi-tier ecosystem where Lockheed Martin, Boeing, Raytheon (RTX), L3Harris, and Northrop Grumman sit at the top as prime contractors, sourcing from thousands of Tier 2 and Tier 3 subcontractors who in turn source from Tier 4 and Tier 5 component suppliers. A single F-35 Lightning II program involves over 1,900 suppliers across 47 states and multiple allied nations. When a Tier 3 supplier in Ohio cannot deliver a machined titanium bracket on schedule, the ripple effect reaches the final assembly line in Fort Worth months later — but the prime often does not know about the delay until it is too late to mitigate. The DoD's push for Software Bill of Materials (SBOM) requirements, codified in Executive Order 14028 and subsequent NIST guidance, adds software supply chain transparency to this physical supply chain challenge. Every software component — commercial libraries, open-source dependencies, firmware modules — must be documented, tracked for known vulnerabilities (CVEs), and reported to acquiring programs. FreedomDev builds the supply chain visibility and SBOM management platforms that defense contractors need to meet these requirements.
We specialize in building custom software for your industry. Tell us what you're dealing with.
DO-178C certification is the single largest cost driver in airborne software development, and most projects underestimate it severely. A DAL A project requires Modified Condition/Decision Coverage (MC/DC) testing that exercises every condition in every decision independently — a testing requirement that can generate test case counts 50x larger than branch coverage alone. Full bidirectional traceability from system requirements (per ARP 4754A) through software high-level requirements, low-level requirements, source code, and executable object code must be maintained and verified. Every tool used in development and verification must be qualified per DO-330 (Software Tool Qualification Considerations). Configuration management must satisfy DO-178C Annex A objectives. The certification liaison process with FAA or EASA DERs requires Stage of Involvement (SOI) reviews at four milestones. Projects that treat DO-178C as a documentation exercise bolted onto the end of development invariably blow budgets by 200-400% and schedules by 12-24 months. Certification must be designed into the development process from requirements capture forward.
Defense software projects routinely handle ITAR-controlled technical data — source code, algorithms, design specifications, test procedures, and manufacturing data for defense articles on the USML. Every developer, tester, systems engineer, and IT administrator who can access this data must be verified as a U.S. person (citizen or permanent resident). Development environments must be logically and physically segregated from non-ITAR work. Version control systems, CI/CD pipelines, cloud infrastructure, and even email systems handling technical data must reside on U.S.-sovereign servers with access controls that prevent any foreign national access — including the cloud provider's own operations staff. Most commercial software development firms use globally distributed teams, offshore development centers, and multinational cloud regions. None of this is permissible for ITAR work. Establishing an ITAR-compliant development environment from scratch requires facility security clearance (DD Form 254), IT infrastructure redesign, personnel screening, and a Technology Control Plan (TCP) — a 6-12 month effort before a single line of code is written.
CMMC 2.0 (Cybersecurity Maturity Model Certification) replaced the self-attestation model under DFARS 252.204-7012 with third-party assessment requirements for contractors handling Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI). Level 2 — required for CUI — demands compliance with all 110 security controls in NIST SP 800-171 Rev 2, assessed by a CMMC Third-Party Assessment Organization (C3PAO). This means every system that stores, processes, or transmits CUI — including software development environments, test systems, build servers, and deployment pipelines — must implement controls spanning access control, audit and accountability, configuration management, identification and authentication, incident response, maintenance, media protection, personnel security, physical protection, risk assessment, security assessment, system and communications protection, and system and information integrity. Most defense subcontractors — especially Tier 2 and Tier 3 suppliers who built custom software on commercial infrastructure — have significant gaps. FreedomDev builds development and production environments with CMMC Level 2 controls baked in from architecture, not retrofitted after assessment failure.
The aerospace MRO market exceeds $90 billion globally, yet most MRO operations run on systems designed for paper-based work card flows. SAP PM, IFS Applications, Ramco Aviation Suite, and custom-built mainframe systems from the 1990s handle scheduled maintenance intervals adequately but cannot ingest real-time sensor data from ACARS, FOQA/FDM systems, or IoT-equipped engine modules for condition-based or predictive maintenance. The industry is moving from time-based maintenance (replace part every 5,000 flight hours) to condition-based maintenance (replace part when sensor data indicates degradation) — a shift that can reduce unscheduled AOG (Aircraft on Ground) events by 30-40% and maintenance costs by 15-25%. But legacy MRO systems have no data model for sensor telemetry, no analytics engine for degradation curves, and no integration pathway to OEM health management systems like Pratt & Whitney's EngineWise or Rolls-Royce's TotalCare. Ripping out a legacy MRO system and replacing it is a $5M-$20M multi-year program. Building a modern analytics and condition-monitoring layer that integrates with the legacy system is faster, cheaper, and lower risk.
Prime contractors like Lockheed Martin, Boeing, and Northrop Grumman have visibility into their Tier 1 suppliers. Below that, the supply chain becomes opaque. A single major weapons system program can involve 1,500-3,000 suppliers across four or five tiers. When the DoD asks a prime to certify the cybersecurity posture of its supply chain under DFARS 252.204-7012, the prime often cannot identify its Tier 3 suppliers — let alone assess their CMMC compliance. Physical supply chain disruptions compound the problem: the COVID-era semiconductor shortage delayed defense production programs by 6-18 months because primes did not have real-time visibility into sub-tier component availability. The DoD's Industrial Base Policy office and the Defense Logistics Agency have both called for digital supply chain visibility as a national security imperative. Building the systems that provide this visibility — supplier mapping, sub-tier risk assessment, real-time inventory and capacity monitoring, and SBOM aggregation across software supply chains — is a software problem, and it requires integration with ERP, PLM, and procurement systems across dozens or hundreds of supplier organizations.
Executive Order 14028 (Improving the Nation's Cybersecurity) and subsequent NIST guidance mandate Software Bill of Materials (SBOM) for software sold to the federal government. For defense contractors, this means every deliverable software system must include a machine-readable SBOM in SPDX or CycloneDX format that lists every component — commercial libraries, open-source packages, firmware modules, and third-party SDKs — with version numbers, license information, and known vulnerability status. The challenge is not generating the SBOM for new development (modern build tools can produce SBOMs automatically). The challenge is legacy systems: embedded avionics software with 20-year-old codebases that predate modern dependency management, firmware built from vendor-supplied binary blobs with no source code access, and COTS (Commercial Off-The-Shelf) components integrated into mission systems where the vendor will not disclose their own software composition. Additionally, continuous vulnerability monitoring against SBOM components requires integration with the National Vulnerability Database (NVD), CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities (KEV) catalog, and OEM-specific security advisories. FreedomDev builds SBOM generation, aggregation, and continuous monitoring platforms that handle both greenfield and legacy software portfolios.
We were 14 months into a SAP MRO implementation that had already blown past budget by $1.2M when we brought FreedomDev in. They built a custom MRO platform in seven months that handled our rotable tracking, digital work orders, and AS9110 compliance requirements — at a third of what we had already spent on SAP consulting. Our mechanics actually use this system instead of working around it.
FreedomDev provides full-lifecycle DO-178C software development from requirements capture through certification. Our process is built around the DO-178C objectives matrix — not bolted on after development. Requirements management uses bidirectional traceability from system requirements (ARP 4754A) through software high-level requirements, low-level requirements, source code, and test cases. For DAL A and DAL B projects, we implement MC/DC (Modified Condition/Decision Coverage) structural coverage analysis using qualified tools (per DO-330). Verification activities are performed by engineers independent from the development team, satisfying DO-178C independence requirements. Configuration management follows DO-178C Annex A with complete problem reporting, change control, and baseline management. We support the FAA certification liaison process through all four Stages of Involvement and prepare the Plan for Software Aspects of Certification (PSAC), Software Development Plan (SDP), Software Verification Plan (SVP), and all required lifecycle data items. For projects where full DAL A is not required across the entire system, we work with DERs to apply architectural partitioning strategies (per ARINC 653 for IMA systems) that allow mixed-criticality components to run at different DAL levels, reducing total certification cost by 40-60% compared to a monolithic DAL A approach.
Learn moreFreedomDev establishes and operates ITAR-compliant software development environments for defense contractors who need to develop or modify USML-controlled software. Our environments satisfy ITAR requirements under 22 CFR 120-130: all personnel with access to technical data are verified U.S. persons, development infrastructure resides on U.S.-sovereign servers with no foreign national access at any level (including infrastructure operations), version control and CI/CD pipelines are logically segregated from non-ITAR projects, and a Technology Control Plan (TCP) governs all access, transfer, and storage of controlled technical data. For contractors who also need EAR compliance (dual-use items on the Commerce Control List), we implement the additional controls required by 15 CFR 730-774 including deemed export provisions. Our environments also satisfy DFARS 252.204-7012 requirements for adequate security of Covered Defense Information (CDI) and are architected for CMMC 2.0 Level 2 assessment. We handle the DD Form 254 facility clearance coordination with DSS (now DCSA) and can establish a compliant environment in 8-12 weeks — compared to the 6-12 months typical for organizations building ITAR capability from scratch.
Learn moreFreedomDev builds custom MRO platforms that replace or extend legacy systems (SAP PM, IFS, Ramco, or custom mainframe MRO) with modern capabilities. Work order management moves from paper-based work cards to tablet-based digital work orders with step-by-step task execution, photo documentation, electronic sign-off, and real-time status visibility. Parts management provides real-time inventory visibility across multiple warehouses with automated reorder triggers, rotable tracking with time-since-overhaul and cycles-since-overhaul calculations, and integration with OEM parts catalogs. The platform ingests sensor data from ACARS, engine health monitoring systems (Pratt & Whitney EngineWise, GE Digital, Rolls-Royce TotalCare data feeds), and IoT-equipped components to enable condition-based maintenance scheduling — replacing fixed-interval task cards with data-driven maintenance decisions that reduce unscheduled AOG events by 30-40%. For defense MRO, the system implements DFARS-compliant handling of Controlled Unclassified Information in maintenance records and supports AS9110 quality management requirements for MRO organizations.
Learn moreA multi-tier supply chain visibility platform that maps supplier relationships from Tier 1 through Tier 4+, monitors supplier health indicators (financial stability, delivery performance, quality metrics, CMMC compliance status), and provides real-time alerts when supply chain risks emerge. The platform integrates with prime contractor ERP and procurement systems (SAP Ariba, Oracle SCM, Jaggaer) and provides a supplier portal where sub-tier suppliers report capacity, inventory, lead times, and compliance status. For SBOM requirements, the platform aggregates software composition data across the supply chain — tracking open-source components, commercial libraries, and firmware versions in every deliverable software system and monitoring them continuously against the National Vulnerability Database (NVD) and CISA KEV catalog. Risk scoring algorithms weight supplier criticality, single-source exposure, geographic concentration, and cybersecurity posture to surface the highest-risk supply chain nodes for program managers and contracting officers. The platform satisfies DFARS 252.204-7012 supply chain risk management requirements and supports Section 889 compliance (prohibition on certain telecommunications equipment).
Learn moreFreedomDev architects and builds software systems that satisfy CMMC 2.0 Level 2 requirements from the ground up — not as a compliance retrofit after a failed C3PAO assessment. We implement all 110 NIST SP 800-171 Rev 2 controls across 14 control families as architectural requirements, not bolt-on policies. Access control (AC): role-based access with least privilege, session controls, and remote access management. Audit and accountability (AU): comprehensive event logging with tamper-evident storage and automated review. Configuration management (CM): baseline configurations, change control, and least-functionality principles. Identification and authentication (IA): multi-factor authentication, password policies, and identifier management. System and communications protection (SC): boundary protection, cryptographic protections for CUI in transit and at rest (FIPS 140-2 validated modules), and network segmentation. For contractors preparing for C3PAO assessment, we build the System Security Plan (SSP), develop Plans of Action and Milestones (POA&Ms) for any residual gaps, and provide the technical evidence packages that assessors require. Our systems are designed to maintain continuous compliance — not just pass a point-in-time assessment.
Learn moreAS9100D is the aerospace-specific quality management standard built on ISO 9001:2015 with additional requirements for product safety, counterfeit part prevention, configuration management, and risk management that are unique to the aerospace supply chain. FreedomDev builds quality management software that digitizes AS9100D processes: document control with revision management and electronic approval workflows, nonconformance tracking with root cause analysis (8D methodology), corrective and preventive action (CAPA) management with effectiveness verification, supplier quality management with approved supplier lists and incoming inspection protocols, first article inspection (FAI) per AS9102, and measurement system analysis (MSA). The system integrates with your ERP for production data and with customer quality portals (Lockheed Martin LMSupply, Boeing D6-82479, Raytheon RRQR) for direct submission of quality records. For organizations pursuing Nadcap accreditation for special processes (heat treating, welding, NDT, chemical processing), we build process parameter monitoring and recording systems that satisfy PRI (Performance Review Institute) audit requirements with real-time data capture — not retroactive log entries.
Learn more| Metric | FreedomDev | Generic SaaS |
|---|---|---|
| DO-178C Certification | Designed-in from requirements — PSAC, SDP, SVP, full traceability, MC/DC for DAL A/B | Certification treated as documentation exercise bolted on after development — 200-400% cost overruns |
| ITAR Compliance | U.S.-person verified teams, segregated environments, TCP in place, DD-254 coordinated | Commercial firms using offshore teams and multinational cloud — not ITAR-capable |
| CMMC 2.0 Readiness | All 110 NIST 800-171 controls baked into architecture from day one | Self-attested compliance with significant gaps discovered at C3PAO assessment |
| MRO Platform Cost | $200K–$600K custom platform, you own the code, no per-seat licensing | $500K–$2M+ for SAP PM/IFS implementation plus $100K–$400K annual licensing |
| Supply Chain Visibility | Multi-tier mapping with real-time risk scoring, SBOM aggregation, and NVD monitoring | Tier 1 visibility only — no sub-tier insight until disruption hits final assembly |
| Vendor Lock-In | Open architecture, your codebase, portable across infrastructure | Proprietary platforms with data export limitations and 5-year contract minimums |
Schedule a technical consultation with our senior architects.
Make your software work for you. Let's build a sensible solution for Aerospace & Defense.
