FreedomDev
TeamAssessmentThe Systems Edge616-737-6350
FreedomDev Logo

Your Dedicated Dev Partner. Zero Hiring Risk. No Agency Contracts.

201 W Washington Ave, Ste. 210

Zeeland MI

616-737-6350

[email protected]

FacebookLinkedIn

Company

  • About Us
  • Culture
  • Our Team
  • Careers
  • Portfolio
  • Technologies
  • Contact

Core Services

  • All Services
  • Custom Software Development
  • Systems Integration
  • SQL Consulting
  • Database Services
  • Software Migrations
  • Performance Optimization

Specialized

  • QuickBooks Integration
  • ERP Development
  • Mobile App Development
  • Business Intelligence / Power BI
  • Business Consulting
  • AI Chatbots

Resources

  • Assessment
  • Blog
  • Resources
  • Testimonials
  • FAQ
  • The Systems Edge ↗

Solutions

  • Data Migration
  • Legacy Modernization
  • API Integration
  • Cloud Migration
  • Workflow Automation
  • Inventory Management
  • CRM Integration
  • Customer Portals
  • Reporting Dashboards
  • View All Solutions

Industries

  • Manufacturing
  • Automotive Manufacturing
  • Food Manufacturing
  • Healthcare
  • Logistics & Distribution
  • Construction
  • Financial Services
  • Retail & E-Commerce
  • View All Industries

Technologies

  • React
  • Node.js
  • .NET / C#
  • TypeScript
  • Python
  • SQL Server
  • PostgreSQL
  • Power BI
  • View All Technologies

Case Studies

  • Innotec ERP Migration
  • Great Lakes Fleet
  • Lakeshore QuickBooks
  • West MI Warehouse
  • View All Case Studies

Locations

  • Michigan
  • Ohio
  • Indiana
  • Illinois
  • View All Locations

Affiliations

  • FreedomDev is an InnoGroup Company
  • Located in the historic Colonial Clock Building
  • Proudly serving Innotec Corp. globally

Certifications

Proud member of the Michigan West Coast Chamber of Commerce

Gov. Contractor Codes

NAICS: 541511 (Custom Computer Programming)CAGE CODE: oYVQ9UEI: QS1AEB2PGF73
Download Capabilities Statement

© 2026 FreedomDev Sensible Software. All rights reserved.

HTML SitemapPrivacy & Cookies PolicyPortal
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Solutions
  4. /
  5. Warehouse Barcode Scanning & Inventory System: Real-Time Accuracy Without SAP WM
Solution

Warehouse Barcode Scanning & Inventory System: Real-Time Accuracy Without SAP WM

Custom barcode-based warehouse management — receiving verification, directed putaway, pick-pack-ship validation, cycle counting, and real-time inventory accuracy across every bin — built for distributors and manufacturers running $5M–$200M in revenue who need SAP WM-grade warehouse control without the SAP WM price tag. Zebra, Honeywell, and Datalogic scanner integration from a Zeeland, MI company with 20+ years building warehouse systems.

FD
20+ Years Enterprise Warehouse Systems
Zebra / Honeywell / Datalogic Integration
Scan-Enforced Accuracy
Zeeland, MI

Paper Pick Lists, Manual Counts, and the $340K Inventory Accuracy Problem

A warehouse manager at a $40M industrial distributor told us last year that he knew the exact moment his operation broke. It was not a dramatic failure — no mispicked pallet of hazmat shipped to the wrong customer, no forklift through a rack. It was a Tuesday morning cycle count that revealed 847 SKUs with quantity discrepancies between the system and the shelf. Not 847 units — 847 distinct SKUs, roughly 22% of their active catalog, where the ERP said one thing and the physical bin said another. His receiving team had been scanning inbound shipments with a consumer-grade Bluetooth scanner paired to a laptop running a spreadsheet macro. Putaway was verbal: the receiver told the forklift driver which aisle to go to, the driver put the pallet wherever space was open, and nobody updated the system until end-of-shift — if they remembered. Picking was paper-based: printed pick tickets sorted by order number, not by warehouse zone or walk path, so pickers crisscrossed 120,000 square feet for every order. The company had an ERP (Epicor Prophet 21), a label printer, and a Wi-Fi network. What they did not have was a system that enforced accuracy at every scan point between the receiving dock and the outbound trailer.

This is not an unusual story. It is the default state of warehouse operations at companies between $5M and $200M in revenue. The National Institute of Standards and Technology estimates that inventory record inaccuracy averages 35% across U.S. warehouses — meaning more than a third of the bin-level quantities in the average warehouse management system do not match physical reality. The root cause is not incompetent warehouse workers. It is the absence of scan-enforced transactions. Every time a human moves a case, puts away a pallet, picks an item, or adjusts a quantity without scanning a barcode that the system validates in real time, an error can enter the data. Over weeks and months, those errors compound. A receiving clerk counts 48 cases but the PO said 50, so they receive 50 in the system and figure they will find the other two later. A picker grabs item A from bin 12-B-04 but the system says it should be in 12-C-07, so they pick it and move on without updating the location. A packer ships an order with a substitution but records the original SKU. Each individual error is small. Aggregated across 500–2,000 transactions per day, inventory accuracy degrades to the point where the system is fiction and the warehouse runs on tribal knowledge.

The financial cost is concrete. Inventory carrying cost runs 20–30% of inventory value per year. A distributor holding $4M in inventory spends $800K–$1.2M annually on warehousing, insurance, depreciation, and capital opportunity cost. When 35% of that inventory is in the wrong location, the wrong quantity, or entirely unaccounted for, carrying costs inflate because you overbuy to buffer against uncertainty, you expedite shipments when stock that your system said you had turns out to be a phantom quantity, and you write off obsolete inventory that sat in the wrong bin for 18 months because nobody knew it was there. A 200-employee manufacturer we assessed in 2024 traced $340,000 in annual write-offs to inventory inaccuracy — product that expired, was damaged from improper storage, or simply could not be found during physical counts. Their annual wall-to-wall physical inventory took 3 full days with the warehouse shut down: $180,000 in lost productivity plus the temporary labor to count. All of this because their warehouse had no barcode scanning system enforcing transaction accuracy at the point of movement.

SAP Warehouse Management and Manhattan Associates are the enterprise answer to this problem. They work. They also cost $500K–$2M to implement for a mid-size operation, take 9–18 months to go live, and require ongoing consulting at $200–$350 per hour for every configuration change. A $30M distributor does not need SAP WM. They need a barcode scanning system that validates every receive, every putaway, every pick, every pack, and every shipment — in real time, on handheld scanners their warehouse workers already know how to use, integrated with the ERP they already run. That is what FreedomDev builds.

35% average inventory record inaccuracy across U.S. warehouses (NIST) — more than a third of bin quantities do not match physical stock

Paper pick lists and verbal putaway directions introduce 1–3% error rate per transaction, compounding across 500–2,000 daily movements

Annual wall-to-wall physical inventory shuts down the warehouse for 2–3 days: $100K–$200K in lost productivity plus temporary labor

$800K–$1.2M annual carrying cost on $4M inventory inflated by overbuying, expediting, and write-offs caused by inaccurate data

SAP WM and Manhattan Associates solve the problem at $500K–$2M implementation cost — 10–40x what mid-market operations can justify

Existing ERP (Epicor, NetSuite, Dynamics) has inventory module but no scan-enforced warehouse execution layer

Need Help Implementing This Solution?

Our engineers have built this exact solution for other businesses. Let's discuss your requirements.

  • Proven implementation methodology
  • Experienced team — no learning on your dime
  • Clear timeline and transparent pricing

What Changes When Every Warehouse Transaction Has a Barcode Behind It

99.5%+
Inventory accuracy sustained year-round with scan-enforced transactions
65–80%
Reduction in mispicks — from 1–3% error rate to under 0.5%
2–3 days
Annual physical inventory eliminated — replaced by perpetual cycle counting
25–40%
Picking productivity increase from RF-directed walk paths and batch picking
90%+
Reduction in receiving errors with scan-verified PO matching
< 6 months
Typical payback period for mid-size warehouse scanning implementation

Facing this exact problem?

We can map out a transition plan tailored to your workflows.

The Transformation

Scan-Enforced Warehouse Execution: Every Movement Validated, Every Bin Accurate

FreedomDev builds barcode scanning warehouse systems that enforce accuracy at the transaction level. Not barcode printing. Not barcode reading. Scan enforcement — the system will not let a warehouse worker complete a receiving transaction, a putaway, a pick, a pack, or a shipment without scanning the right barcode at the right location at the right time. This is the fundamental difference between a warehouse that has barcode scanners and a warehouse that has a barcode-based inventory system. Plenty of warehouses own Zebra handhelds. The scanners sit on chargers at the end of every aisle. Workers use them to look up item locations, print labels, and occasionally verify a quantity. But the system does not require the scan. Workers can — and do — skip it when they are in a hurry, when the barcode is damaged, when they know the item by sight. Every skipped scan is an accuracy leak. Our systems close those leaks by making the barcode scan the transaction trigger. No scan, no putaway confirmation. No scan, no pick confirmation. No scan, no shipment. The scanner is not a convenience tool — it is the control mechanism.

The architecture is straightforward: handheld barcode scanners (Zebra TC52/TC72, Honeywell CK65/CT60, or any Android-based enterprise mobile computer) running a browser-based warehouse application that communicates in real time with a central server integrated to your ERP. We build the mobile application as a responsive web app — not a native Android or Windows CE application — because browser-based deployment eliminates the app distribution and update nightmare that plagues native mobile WMS installations. When we push an update to the warehouse application, every scanner in the building gets it on next page load. No MDM enrollment, no APK sideloading, no version fragmentation across your scanner fleet. The application is designed for one-handed operation with gloved fingers on a 4–5 inch screen: large scan targets, high-contrast text, minimal typing, and audio/haptic confirmation on every successful scan. Warehouse workers should never have to take off a glove to use the system.

Integration to your ERP is bidirectional and real-time. When a purchase order is received in Epicor, Prophet 21, NetSuite, SAP Business One, or Microsoft Dynamics, it appears on the scanner as a receivable PO within seconds. The receiver scans each inbound case or pallet barcode, the system validates it against the PO line, confirms the quantity, and assigns a putaway location based on rules you define — slotting by velocity, by product category, by customer allocation, or by physical constraints like weight and temperature. The putaway is not complete until the worker scans the bin barcode at the destination location. That scan-confirmed putaway updates the ERP inventory in real time: quantity on hand, bin location, lot number, receipt date, and receiving reference. No end-of-day batch upload. No manual location entry. The ERP reflects physical reality within seconds of the pallet touching the shelf.

Scan-Verified Receiving & PO Matching

Inbound shipments are received against open purchase orders on the handheld scanner. The receiver scans the item barcode (UPC, EAN-13, or GS1-128), the system matches it to the PO line, displays expected quantity, and the receiver confirms or adjusts the actual count. Over-receipts and short-receipts are flagged immediately — not discovered during the next cycle count. For vendors who ship with ASN (Advanced Shipping Notices) or GS1-128 license plate barcodes, the system can receive an entire pallet in a single scan by parsing the SSCC-18 and matching it against the ASN data. Receiving accuracy goes from 94–96% (manual count and data entry) to 99.5%+ (scan-verified against PO).

Directed Putaway with Bin-Level Confirmation

After receiving confirmation, the system directs the forklift driver or warehouse worker to a specific putaway location based on configurable slotting rules. Velocity-based slotting places fast movers in floor-level pick-face locations and slow movers in upper rack positions. Category-based rules keep hazmat separated from food-grade product. Weight-based rules prevent heavy pallets from going to upper rack levels that cannot handle the load. The putaway transaction is not recorded until the worker scans the destination bin barcode, confirming the product is physically in the location the system now shows. This eliminates the single largest source of inventory inaccuracy in most warehouses: product that is physically in one location but recorded in another.

RF-Directed Picking: Zone, Batch, Wave, and Discrete

The scanning system supports four picking methods and can run all four simultaneously across different warehouse zones. Zone picking assigns workers to specific areas — the picker stays in their zone and picks all orders passing through it. Batch picking groups multiple orders together so the picker collects items for 10–20 orders in a single pass through the warehouse. Wave picking releases groups of orders timed to carrier pickup schedules so packed shipments are staged at the dock when the truck arrives. Discrete picking handles single-order, single-pick situations for oversized or high-value items. In all four modes, the scanner directs the picker to the exact bin location, the picker scans the bin barcode and the item barcode to confirm the right product from the right location, and the system decrements inventory and advances to the next pick. No paper. No guessing. No mispicks that are not caught until the customer calls.

Pack Verification & Shipment Validation

At the pack station, the worker scans each item going into the carton. The system validates that every item in the order has been picked and scanned, flags missing items or wrong items before the carton is sealed, calculates the correct carton size and weight for rate shopping, and prints the shipping label with the carrier-compliant barcode (FedEx, UPS, USPS, LTL PRO number). The outbound shipment is not marked as shipped in the ERP until the final carton barcode is scanned at the loading dock — confirming the physical shipment matches the system record. This last-mile scan closes the loop: from PO receipt to customer delivery, every movement has a barcode-validated transaction backing it.

Perpetual Cycle Counting (No More Annual Shutdown)

Annual wall-to-wall physical inventory is the warehouse equivalent of an annual doctor visit: it tells you how sick you are, not how to stay healthy. Our barcode scanning system enables perpetual cycle counting — counting a subset of SKUs every day based on ABC velocity classification, discrepancy history, or random sampling. A-class items (top 20% of SKUs by movement) get counted weekly. B-class items get counted monthly. C-class items get counted quarterly. Workers scan the bin barcode, count the physical quantity, scan confirmation, and any discrepancy is flagged for immediate investigation while the trail is still warm — not six months later during the annual count when nobody remembers what happened. Warehouses running perpetual cycle counts with barcode scanning achieve 98–99.5% inventory accuracy sustained year-round, versus the 90–95% accuracy that degrades between annual counts.

Lot Tracking, Expiration Management & FIFO Enforcement

For distributors handling food, chemicals, pharmaceuticals, or any product with shelf life, the scanning system tracks lot numbers and expiration dates at the bin level. When a picker is directed to a location, the system enforces FIFO (first expiry, first out) by directing the pick to the oldest lot. If a lot is within its expiration warning window, the system flags it on the scanner screen so the warehouse can pull it for markdown, donation, or disposal before it expires on the shelf. Lot traceability means that if a supplier issues a recall, you can identify every bin, every customer shipment, and every remaining unit of the affected lot within minutes — not the days or weeks it takes to trace through paper records and spreadsheet logs.

Want a Custom Implementation Plan?

We'll map your requirements to a concrete plan with phases, milestones, and a realistic budget.

  • Detailed scope document you can share with stakeholders
  • Phased approach — start small, scale as you see results
  • No surprises — fixed-price or transparent hourly
“
We went from 87% inventory accuracy with annual physical counts to 99.2% sustained accuracy with daily cycle counts — in four months. Mispicks dropped from 40+ per week to under 5. Our warehouse workers adapted faster than I expected because the scanners actually made their jobs easier, not harder. The system paid for itself before the end of the first year.
Warehouse Operations Manager—West Michigan Industrial Distribution Company ($45M Revenue)

Our Process

01

Warehouse Assessment & Workflow Mapping (1–2 Weeks)

We walk your warehouse floor — physically, not from a conference room. We map every workflow from dock door to dock door: how product arrives, who receives it and how they record it, where it goes for putaway and how the location is determined, how picks are generated and executed, how orders are packed and labeled, and how shipments are loaded and confirmed. We document your current scanner hardware (manufacturer, model, OS version, wireless capability), your ERP system and its inventory module capabilities, your barcode standards (UPC, GS1-128, internal barcodes), and your Wi-Fi coverage across the facility. Deliverable: a warehouse workflow document showing current state versus scan-enforced target state, hardware requirements, ERP integration points, and a phased implementation plan with cost estimates.

02

Barcode Standards & Label Design (1 Week)

Before building the scanning application, we lock down barcode standards. Which barcode symbology for each use case: UPC-A for retail items, Code 128 for internal locations, GS1-128 for shipping labels with embedded lot and expiration data, QR codes for bin locations that encode aisle-rack-level-position in a single scan. We design and test label formats for every barcode type your warehouse will print and scan — bin location labels, license plate labels for received pallets, pick-to-carton labels, and outbound shipping labels. Every label is tested on your actual scanner hardware at your actual scanning distances before development begins, because a barcode that works on a test sheet at 6 inches but fails on a shrink-wrapped pallet at 36 inches is useless.

03

Scanner Application Development & ERP Integration (4–8 Weeks)

We build the browser-based scanning application in parallel with the ERP integration layer. The scanner app covers every workflow identified in the assessment: receiving, putaway, picking (all modes your operation requires), packing, shipping, cycle counting, inventory adjustments, and bin transfers. The ERP integration is built as a bidirectional API layer: purchase orders, sales orders, transfer orders, and inventory transactions flow from the ERP to the scanner application, and scan-confirmed transactions flow back to the ERP in real time. We test against your actual ERP instance — not a generic sandbox — with your actual item master, your actual warehouse locations, and your actual order data. For Epicor, Prophet 21, NetSuite, SAP Business One, and Dynamics 365, we have existing integration patterns that accelerate development.

04

Hardware Configuration & Floor Testing (1–2 Weeks)

We configure every scanner in your fleet: Wi-Fi profiles, browser settings, scan engine parameters (symbology filters, scan tone, aim pattern), and power management to maximize battery life through a full shift. We conduct floor testing in every zone of your warehouse — including the dead spots near loading docks, inside freezer sections, and at maximum rack height where the Wi-Fi signal attenuates through steel racking. Every workflow is tested end-to-end on the actual floor with actual product: receive a real PO, putaway to a real bin, pick a real order, pack it, and ship it. Issues found on the floor — scan distances that do not work with your rack depth, Wi-Fi drops during putaway in the far bay, screen glare under your warehouse lighting — are fixed before go-live, not discovered by frustrated workers on day one.

05

Parallel Operation & Go-Live (2–4 Weeks)

The scanning system runs alongside your current process for a validation period. Workers execute every transaction in both the new scanning system and the existing process (paper, spreadsheet, or legacy system). We compare results transaction-by-transaction to verify accuracy, identify edge cases, and build worker confidence before the old process is retired. Training is conducted on the warehouse floor with the actual scanners, not in a conference room with a PowerPoint deck. Each workflow — receiving, putaway, picking, packing, shipping, cycle counting — gets its own training session with the workers who perform that function. Go-live is phased: receiving first (lowest disruption risk), then putaway, then picking, then packing and shipping. Each phase stabilizes before the next begins.

Before vs After

MetricWith FreedomDevWithout
Implementation Cost$80K–$200K (own it permanently)SAP WM: $500K–$2M+ implementation
Time to Go-Live8–16 weeks, phased rolloutSAP WM: 9–18 months
Annual Licensing$0 — you own the softwareManhattan: $80K–$200K/year licensing
Configuration ChangesYour team or us at $150–$200/hrSAP/Manhattan: $200–$350/hr consulting
ERP IntegrationNative integration with your existing ERPRequires middleware or certified connector ($50K–$150K)
Scanner HardwareWorks with your existing Zebra/Honeywell fleetMay require certified hardware refresh ($100K+)
CustomizationBuilt around your floor workflows from day oneAdapt your workflows to the platform's assumptions
Ongoing Support$1K–$3K/month maintenance and monitoring$5K–$15K/month for vendor support tier

Ready to Solve This?

Schedule a direct technical consultation with our senior architects.

Explore More

Inventory ManagementERP ImplementationAPI IntegrationWarehousingManufacturingLogistics

Frequently Asked Questions

Will this work with our existing barcode scanners?
Almost certainly yes. Because we build the scanner application as a browser-based web app, it runs on any device with a modern browser and a barcode scan engine. Zebra TC series (TC52, TC57, TC72, TC77), Honeywell CK and CT series (CK65, CT40, CT60), Datalogic Memor and Skorpio series, and even consumer-grade Android devices with camera-based scanning for low-volume applications. If your scanners are running Android 8+ or Windows 10 with a modern browser, they will work. We have deployed on fleets where three generations of Zebra hardware — MC9200s, TC52s, and TC72s — all run the same application without modification. The only scanners we cannot support are legacy Windows CE 5.0 or Windows Mobile 6.5 devices with no modern browser — and those devices are 10–15 years old. If you are running hardware that old, a scanner refresh is overdue regardless. Zebra TC52 units run $1,100–$1,400 each, and a 20-scanner fleet replacement is $22K–$28K — a fraction of the inventory accuracy savings in the first year.
How does this integrate with our ERP?
We build a real-time bidirectional API integration between the scanning system and your ERP. Purchase orders, sales orders, and transfer orders flow from the ERP to the scanning application so warehouse workers see their tasks on the scanner. Scan-confirmed transactions — receipts, putaways, picks, shipments, adjustments, and cycle counts — flow back to the ERP and update inventory quantities, locations, lot assignments, and transaction history in real time. For Epicor (Prophet 21, Kinetic), NetSuite, SAP Business One, Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central, and Microsoft Dynamics GP, we have existing integration connectors that we adapt to your specific configuration. For less common ERPs or legacy systems with limited API capability, we build middleware using database-level integration (direct queries with change data capture), file-based exchange (CSV, XML, or EDI), or custom REST wrapper APIs. The integration layer includes retry logic, error queuing, and a monitoring dashboard so you can see every transaction flowing between systems and immediately identify any failures.
What about Wi-Fi dead spots in our warehouse?
Wi-Fi coverage gaps are the number one infrastructure issue we find in warehouse scanning deployments, and they are predictable: loading dock areas with metal overhead doors, freezer and cooler sections with insulated walls, far bays near exterior walls, and narrow aisles between tall steel racking that creates signal shadow zones. During our floor testing phase, we conduct a Wi-Fi heat map survey of your entire facility using the actual scanners that will be deployed — not a theoretical model, but real signal strength measurements at operating height in every aisle, at every rack level, and at every dock door. Where coverage gaps exist, the options are adding access points (enterprise-grade Cisco or Aruba APs run $500–$1,500 each installed), repositioning existing access points, or configuring the scanning application for offline queuing in known dead zones. Our offline mode caches scan transactions locally on the device and automatically syncs when connectivity resumes, so a Wi-Fi drop in the back corner of the warehouse does not stop work — it just delays the ERP update by the seconds or minutes until the worker walks back into coverage.
How long does it take for warehouse workers to learn the system?
Warehouse workers who already use barcode scanners — even if only for basic lookup or label printing — typically reach full proficiency on the new scanning workflows within 3–5 shifts. Workers who have never used a handheld scanner take 5–10 shifts. The key to fast adoption is that our scanner interface is designed for warehouse workers, not office workers. Large buttons, high-contrast text readable in direct sunlight or dim warehouse lighting, minimal text input (almost everything is scan-driven), clear audio tones for successful and failed scans, and screen layouts that follow the physical workflow sequence. A receiving screen shows exactly what a receiver needs: PO number, vendor, expected items, and a scan target. No menus to navigate, no settings to configure, no tabs to switch between. We train on the warehouse floor during the parallel operation phase, so workers learn on their actual product, in their actual aisles, with their actual scanners. By the time the old process is retired, every worker has completed every workflow multiple times with the scanning system and knows exactly what to do.
What is the ROI timeline for a warehouse barcode scanning system?
For a mid-size warehouse (20,000–200,000 square feet, 10–50 warehouse workers, $5M–$200M in revenue), the ROI calculation includes five measurable components. First, inventory accuracy improvement: moving from 85–90% to 99%+ accuracy reduces overstock purchasing, eliminates emergency expediting, and cuts annual write-offs — typically $50K–$300K in annual savings depending on inventory value. Second, picking productivity: RF-directed picking with optimized walk paths and batch picking increases picks per hour by 25–40%, which either reduces overtime labor or increases throughput without adding headcount — $40K–$150K in annual labor savings for a 20+ person pick team. Third, elimination of the annual physical inventory: replacing a 2–3 day warehouse shutdown with perpetual cycle counting saves $100K–$200K per year in lost productivity and temporary labor. Fourth, shipping error reduction: scan-verified packing and shipment validation reduces mispicks and mis-ships from 1–3% to under 0.5%, cutting return processing, re-shipping, and customer credits by $30K–$100K annually. Fifth, reduced customer chargebacks: retailers and large B2B customers levy chargebacks of $25–$200 per compliance failure (wrong item, wrong quantity, missing ASN, incorrect label) — accurate scanning systems cut chargebacks by 80–95%. Total first-year savings for a mid-size operation typically range from $150K to $500K against an implementation investment of $80K–$200K. Most clients break even within 4–8 months.
Can the system handle multiple warehouses or locations?
Yes. The architecture is multi-site by design. Each warehouse location has its own bin map, slotting rules, pick methods, and local user assignments, but all locations share a single central database and a unified ERP integration layer. A sales rep checking stock availability sees real-time quantities across all locations — available, allocated, in-transit between locations, and on-order — in a single view. Inter-warehouse transfers are scan-enforced: the sending warehouse picks and scans the outbound transfer, the system creates an in-transit record, and the receiving warehouse scans to confirm receipt. The in-transit inventory is visible to everyone but not allocatable until the receiving scan confirms it. For companies operating 2–5 warehouses, this inter-site visibility eliminates the phone calls and emails between warehouse managers trying to figure out where a specific lot or SKU is located. The system also supports different operational profiles per location — a high-volume distribution center running wave picking and conveyor sortation alongside a smaller satellite warehouse running simple discrete picking — all on the same platform.

Stop Working For Your Software

Make your software work for you. Let's build a sensible solution.